The "look" is that the lighted image is what stands out and the background, while it isn't black, it very much underexposed. It works and it works well but it's not 10fps.
#Yongnuo supersync iso
Now, for the college level play, we had ceiling rafter mounted lights, which were awesome placement.īut, still, yeah, we were shooting at regular sync and lower iso because we didn't have these higher iso available. I think I was using Lumedyne kits back then as they were lightweight and simple to clamp onto whatever in the upper level. The old school method does work, obviously, because that's what we used to do. This is what we did in the old days with slide film and early digital. Your thinking is correct about the camera sync speed and the flash freezing the action.
#Yongnuo supersync full
The Einsteins wouldn't be a first choice for hyper sync because they are IGBT and, like you said, even to get basic hyper sync, they have to be used at full power if it would even work. With no flash my ambient is 8000, 2.8, 640 shutter. Or is the old school and set the ambient 2 stops under and let the Strobe be the main light? So the settings would be 250 Shutter, Aperture 2.8, Iso whatever the difference( I will guess around 4000) and the flash would be what freezes the action?ĭoes this sound correct? What am I missing?
So if go back to the camera sync speed of 250 and lower the Output of the Einstein to 1/16-1/64, I can achieve a FPS of around 10. Doesn't lend to higher FPS since you need 1.7 seconds for recovery. Going through the utility, you can Hyper sync, but the 640 needs to be on FULL power. The school just bought 2 Einstein 640's and PW MC2. I know there are threads on here that explain this better. Basically the shutter is freezing the action and the speed lights are providing a little Pop and helping w WB. You can use Hyper sync ( shutter over 250) pretty easily. I have been using my speed lights with the PW TT5 and TT1 to try and light basketball. Using Einstein Strobe and Hyper sync for Basketball ?Ī complex question.But there are rumors of an X2 trigger from Godox and that the Fuji/MFT gear may just move straight to that.
#Yongnuo supersync upgrade
It also took a firmware upgrade to get rear-curtain sync. Zoom control isn't as precise (universal, not per group), Gr mode requires a 2012 or later camera model (my FF is a 5DMkII, so no love there), and I don't think Godox has implemented the shutter-remote capabilities of the 622, and their screen/UI isn't as nice as the YN-622-TX's. The Godox X system does have some drawbacks vs. But I do get that after having TTL/HSS/remote custom settings, etc. But I love the fact that my YN-622 gear still works with my MFT gear and X100T for remote power control and sync. I like having full frame if I wanna play with it. I'm an accumulator not a switcher, so I kept my Canon gear. To me, that was the sole appeal of the EOS M mirrorless system: flash compatibility.
In the meantime, if you just need thinner DoF, using ND filters on the lens may be your own workaround. But it's not here yet.Ĭactus V6II, and the Nissin Air triggering systems are the other two possibilities, but again, neither is 100% there, yet with Fuji TTL/HSS support, either, and both are going to be more expensive than Yongnuo 622s when they do, and you'll probably need a flash that speaks Fuji TTL to use them. This is a manual-only combination that should allow for HSS and it only costs about $10 more than a YN-560IV and YN-560-TX. Well, it's not actually there yet, but hopefully within the next year or so, Godox will have a solution for you, if they successfully deliver an X1T-F to go with their TT600. And, of course, this isn't actual pulsed HSS/FP.
#Yongnuo supersync Pc
You might (stress might) be able to use the tail-sync (aka hypersync/supersync/etc.) capability of the 622s via PC port to get a higher sync speed with some flashes, but I never had any luck with my YN-560 (Mk I) only my 580EXII. They only make 622s in those two flavors.